| History of team building &
The Hawthorne Experiments |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
The hawthorne
experiments
The Hawthorne Experiments were conducted by Professor Elton Mayo, from
1927 to 1932, at the Western Electric Hawthorne Works in Chicago. The
experiments were primarily started with the intention of studying the
relationship between productivity and work conditions. Professor Mayo
started these experiments by examining the physical and environmental
influences of the workplace (e.g. brightness of lights, humidity) and
then moved on to the psychological aspects (e.g. breaks, group pressure,
working hours, managerial leadership). |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
The Hawthorne
Effect
The findings in Hawthorne Experiments have been generally described as
the “Hawthorne Effect”, which can be summarized as "Individual behaviors
may be altered because they know they are being studied." This is,
however, only one of the many useful conclusions that Professor Mayo
made. For example, Mayo also found that worker productivity increased
with the psychological stimulus of being shown individual attention,
feeling involved, and being made to feel important. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
About the
Experiment
Mayo selected two ladies from the factory, and they in turn chose
another four ladies to participate in the experiment. The team worked in
isolation, under the supervision of a friendly supervisor who
established a working relationship with them. He took time to explain
the changes that were to be introduced, asked for their feedback and
listened to their complaints.
Mayo then varied the working conditions like working hours and number
and duration of rest breaks in stages. The level of production is
mechanically recorded, while the supervisor recorded the team’s
behavior.
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Elton Mayo's
Conclusions on Team Performance
Among other findings, these conclusions made by Mayo have significantly
impacted the way management ran their production plant from then on and,
we believe, resulted in the eventual birth of the concept of team
building:
•
Relationships between supervisor and workers affected productivity.
Mayo discovered that the relationships between workers and their
supervisors affected production. The working relationship that the
supervisor established with the workers was not a usual on at that
time. Women did not have a high social status at the workplace and
when the supervisor asked for the feedback from the ladies and
listened to their complaints, it gave them a sense of self-worth.
Mayo believed that this spurred them on to produce more even when
all the privileges were taken away.
• Workgroup norms significantly affected productivity. If most
people produced at a particular level after a change was made,
everyone tended to produce at that level, as it was ‘a fair day’s
work’ (this confirmed similar conclusions made previously by other
researches)
• The workplace has a culture. A worker’s performance is affected by
internal and external social demands. Informal groups within the
work plant influence the habits and attitudes of the workers.
• Being taken care of. Being recognized for their work, feeling
secured and a sense of belonging is more important that physical
conditions at work.
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Emergence of
team building
One of the most crucial conclusions from the experiments is that toward
the end of the tests, when all of the privileges were taken away,
productivity continued to rise to an all time high. It was reasonably
concluded that the production team were more motivated to work hard by
the factors listed above than the physical working conditions. The
researchers also noted that there was a possibility that the production
team was grateful that the experiments were extended from the initial
arrangement of one year to five.
In the decades that followed, employers became aware of the importance
of maintaining a positive work culture and relationship with workers and
probably led to the emergence of team building exercises and retreats. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Applying
Lessons from the Hawthorne Experiments in team building
team building has a very broad meaning; it may mean very different
things to different organizations. To some it may simply mean building
cohesion among participants, while to others it may mean improving
communication and sharing of information between departments. In
essence, team building can mean anything that helps you improve your
team’s performance.
If team building is new to your organization, you may want to use the
lessons from the Hawthorne Experiments to help you identify some
specific areas of team building that you can begin with.
According to the Hawthorne Experiments, these four areas of a work team
that can affect productivity: |
| |
|
 |
| |
• Work
relations between supervisors and workers. Do supervisors and
workers have a healthy working relationship? Are the supervisors
trained on skills like coaching and supervision, communication and
leadership? Are there any unfair treatments in the department? Are
there systems in place to ensure fair treatment of workers? If we
need to address issues in this area, then the team building for your
organization can focus on team bonding, leadership and communication
skills.
There are two ways to improve systems and workflow at
the work place. One of them is to enlist the help of consultants who
will work with you to fine tune the systems at your office. The
other way is to use team building exercises like “Teams-Talk” to
brainstorm for improvements at the workplace. In this way, the
workers will feel that they are part of the decision making process.
|
| |
|
 |
| |
•
Workgroup norms in the organization. What is the standard set for
the workers? How appropriate is this standard compared across
industry? Do the workers perceive this as a “fair day’s work”?
Historical data will provide a good gauge of what is a fair level of
work to require from workers, provided that there are no major
changes in the industry. Information can also be gathered when
interviewing new staff from companies in similar industries or
through external research agencies.
If your workers are performing way below the industry
standard, then we must find out the reason and manage the change
towards healthier workgroup norms. On the other hand, if production
is far ahead of competition, we must keep our workers motivated to
continue the favorable situation. We must also find out about the
stress level and fatigue level of the workers and manage them wisely
so as not to create problems in the future.
To get reasonably truthful feedback from your staff,
you may want to consider using “änergy picasso” (a team building
exercise) or an anonymous survey to assist you. Engaging external
consultants to conduct these surveys on your behalf will, in many
cases, get higher participation and more candid feedback from staff
as it guarantees anonymity.
|
| |
|
 |
| |
• Culture
of the workers. What is attitude of the worker when he is first
employed by the company? How has this attitude changed when he is
integrated into the work teams? What brings about the change? These
are questions which may help us rate the culture of our workforce.
Education in work culture will help workers be more
aware of how they can affect the morale of their team mates.
Understanding the fact that being positive and supportive is
contagious will not only encourage others but also motivate them as
it instills a social responsibility. team building events focusing
in this area serves well as an informal approach to inculcate these
values.
Reward systems that encourage desired behavior in this
case will do two things: It will reinforce positive behavior; and
create the “Hawthorne Effect” (bring about positive behavior in the
workforce because they know that they are being monitored).
|
| |
|
 |
| |
• Does
management express concern toward the team- their employees? Is
there freedom of speech at the workplace? Do they have avenues to
make suggestions to improve working conditions or help increase
productivity? Are they rewarded if they meet certain targets?
Medical insurance, car allowances, bonuses, rewards, birthday
celebrations or offs and team building retreats are just some common
ways that organizations show concern toward their employees. How
many of such measures do you have in place?
|
|
 |
| |
|
why not post
these questions to your staff and kick start the Hawthorne Effect in
your office today? |
| |